Watch our video here.
Model Articles are Articles of Association which apply automatically unless modified or replaced by bespoke articles. If Model Articles are adopted, decision making by the directors is governed as follows: –
-
- Decisions must be passed by a majority or unanimously by all eligible directors (Model Article 7(1)).
- If a company has only one director and its Articles of Association do not require it to have more than one director, the director can make decisions without having regard to the articles relating to directors’ decision-making (Model Article 7(2)).
- The quorum for directors’ meeting may be fixed from time to time but it must never be less than two and, unless fixed, it is two (Model Article 11(2)).
- If at any time the total number of directors is less than the quorum required, the directors must not take any decisions other than to appoint further directors or to convene a general meeting to enable the shareholders to appoint further directors (Model Article 11(3)).
It was widely accepted that Model Articles 11(2) and 11(3) did not apply to sole director companies due to Model Article 7(2) superseding the provisions of the Model Articles which relate to directors’ decision making. However, the recent High Court decision has brought this into question.
The High Court held that Model Article 11(2), which requires at least two directors to constitute a quorum, was a requirement for the company to have two directors. Therefore, the fall-back provision in Model Article 7(2) could not apply which renders the use of unamended Model Articles by sole director companies invalid.
Why does this case matter?
The two main points from this case are: –
-
- The Model Articles are not suitable for adoption by private companies with a sole director; and
- Any decisions taken by a sole director with basic Model Articles adopted may be considered invalid (unless the decision of the director was to appoint a further director under Model Article 11(3)).
What does this case mean for you?
To avoid challenges to the validity of directors’ decisions, sole directors of private companies with standard Model Articles adopted are being strongly urged to consider:
-
- Amending the articles to allow the sole director to make valid decisions in the future; and
- Passing a shareholder resolution to ratify any actions taken by a sole director already (as any amendment to the articles will not have retrospective effect).
How can we help?
We are offering a fixed fee of £450 (plus VAT) to: –
-
- Provide new Articles of Association, to comply with the law and ensure that future decisions of a sole director are valid;
- Register the Articles with Companies House; and
- Supply a template shareholders’ resolution, to ratify any previous decisions made by a sole director.
Nalders has a dedicated and committed team of business law specialists in Cornwall who are ready and waiting to advise you on any employment, company or commercial arrangements. Feel free to get in touch with Dale Band, Gayle McDermott, Lee Middleton, Luke Smith, or Dan Barnden or by using our message system for more information.
Enquire
What Our Clients Say
“Having had the pleasure of working with Nalders on a complex funding transaction during a protracted period of adversity created by Covid-19, I can wholeheartedly recommend them. Dale and Simon were superb, their knowledge, speed of response and tenacity in the face of many challenges with Land Registry greatly facilitated the conclusion of the facility.”
“Thank you Gayle, very impressed with the service and your help and expertise. Would have no hesitation in contacting Nalders again when the need arises.”
“I thought I would send you an email to let you know how pleased I was with the service I received from your company. I have recently had to part company with my business partner and required a Share Purchase Agreement. I was allocated Lee Middleton from your company, from the first time we spoke he was fully aware of what was required he would allow me to discuss my views and what I wished to achieve he would then advise me from a legal aspect of the best way to deal with the issues arising but still getting the end result I was asking for. I found him very responsive, always returned emails and calls in a timely matter. I personally found him a pleasure to work with through these difficult times and I feel this needs to be recognised. Could you kindly pass on this email to him as I believe without his guidance and support I would not have achieved the result I did.”
“Luke, thank you again for all your work and helpful advice throughout this project. It is extremely important to me, and reassuring, to have an efficient and effective relationship in place from the outset so that we can all get across the finish line in front! This has been the case and I look forward to working with you again on future cases.“
Latest News
Nine common mistakes in debt recovery
Debt recovery is often a delicate balancing act for any business. You must ensure your business is protected from bad debts, however, you do not want to jeopardise a good business relationship by mishandling a disputed debt. ‘If you take the wrong action, miss...
Legal considerations when using AI in your business
Are you already using or considering using AI (artificial intelligence) in your business; whether in the form of product delivery to your customers or clients, or to help in the day-to-day administration of your business? AI is fast becoming an accessible and often...
Why your social media contest needs clear terms and conditions
Social media contests have become a popular way for businesses to engage with existing customers, drive up new user participation, increase brand visibility and to foster new sales through marketing data and analysis. However, running a successful campaign requires...



